[nc-review] Can we get responses from each constituency?

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Can you suggest How to ameliorate DNSO Process' Frustrations
which have been summarized as The List of DNSO Issues. 

[Suggetion 1] DNSO/ICANN Election
To invite candidates to various forums such as each constituency,
GA, Names Council in the form of Q&A Session.

I hope people can add their views to this small suggestion.
What I feel sure through this dnso review process is we need 
CHECKS and BALANCES inside DNSO/ICANN.

Otherwise this effort to coordinate cyberspace will get nowhere
but rumours that there must have been a well-written scenario 
before we staged it.

YJ

FYI, The List of DNSO Issues.

I. MISTRUST: 
Everything seems to have been discussed and decided behind the 
scenes. Where is the place to be discussed or where should be?

II. SKEPTICISM: 
What's the use for the energies to pour into the works
since it is likely to be decided by one-shot comment out of blue?

III. DISORDER: 
Fine with democracy. However, how can we reach literal consensus 
by jig-jagging in the same place instead of sprilaing into the goal?

IV. CHASM:
We are different. Non-commercial is different from commercial sector.
Developing countries' non-commercial groups are different from 
US or developed non-commercial groups. etc. How can we cross the
chasm? 
--------------------------------------------
                            [End of Message]