DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[nc-org] Re: Additional statement?

> Some constituencies support supplementing the
> .org policy with the following statement:
> "The Task Force would, in the interest of increasing
> competition, not wish to see the incumbent dominant
> provider of gTLD registry services, Verisign, take an
> interest in or contract to deliver critical services
> to the new management organization."
> What do you think?

The gTLD Registries Constituency does not approve of the
imposition of such restrictions on any prospective provider
of services to .org.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>