DNSO Archives: [nc-org]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-org]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-org] Dot org report

To: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
Subject: Re: [nc-org] Dot org report
From: Marc Schneiders <marc@schneiders.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 22:30:36 +0100 (CET)
cc: Mueller@syr.edu, comments-dotorg@dnso.org, nc-org@dnso.org, roessler@does-not-exist.org
In-Reply-To: <200111082124.WAA11181@balsa.cetp.ipsl.fr>
Sender: owner-nc-org@dnso.org

On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, at 22:24 [=GMT+0100], Elisabeth Porteneuve wrote:

> It is a policy and responsibility matter to enter 
> into implementation details, unless you plan to have 
> VeriSign running it forever.

There are other companies that could run a registry. Tucows comes to
mind.

-- 
Marc@Schneiders.ORG

References:
- Re: [nc-org] Dot org report
  - From: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>