ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-intake]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-intake] committee composition


Phil,

> 
> I still think this can be done with a few people.
> 
> I cannot imagine a situation were one constituency's 
> important issue is
> proposed to the intake committee who reject it for no good 
> reason and then
> that constituency says nothing more! Would they not raise a 
> point of order
> at the start of the NC meeting? Would they not lobby the NC chairman
> beforehand? Would they not scream to the entire NC list?
> Of course they would.  So, what is served by having a large intake
> committee?


I guess you're right.

Roberto
who sees things differently after lunch ;>)


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>