RE: [nc-imp] Draft v2.0 of the Transfers Implementation Report
Title: RE: [nc-imp] Draft v2.0 of the Transfers Implementation Report
I'd like ot support Tim's comment on #11. In fact, I had an additional comment that we should not limit when and how registrars can communicate with their own customers. It's one thing to insulate the confirmation email and keep it "official," but it's over-reaching to dictate other communications. So, I would recommend eliminating the 2nd paragraphof the comment.
I also have a question about the comments to #23, which state that the special whois cannot be rate limited. It seems like there is potential for abuse of this special whois, particularly if some registrars give their resellers the ability to use it. So, while I appreciate the need to make the special whois highly available, I think we still need a mechanism or trigger for limiting it in order to stop abuse.
But, generally, great job! Thanks, Elana
Excellent presentation. We certainly appreciate all the time you and your
Recommendation 11, Comments and Issues, second paragraph: I'm concerned that
Recommendation 24, Comments and Issues, second paragraph: I prefer to see
The attached draft is for discussion at our teleconference in approximately