ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-deletes]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-deletes] two additional issues


Title: RE: [nc-deletes] two additional issues

(1) agree - let's opt for the 180 days.

(2) how did it work with registrars who did this?  Was it effectively a two for the price of one deal or does the registrant think that they just have a one year. 

Jane

-----Original Message-----
From: Bret Fausett [mailto:fausett@lextext.com]
Sent: 24 January 2003 16:16
To: nc-deletes@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-deletes] two additional issues


(1) While looking for a citation for the number of expired but non-deleted names, it occurred to me that our draft report does not explicitly account for clearing out any backlog of such names. On a going forward basis, we recommend that all expired domains be deleted within a time certain, but what about names that expired in the past? Perhaps we should add a provision that states that all such names should be deleted within 180 days of the policy taking effect. (The longer window would avoid a situation in which hundreds of thousands of names are deleted all at once.)

(2) I'm also aware of another situation that we may not have acccounted for. During its landrush, I believe that Afilias required initial .info registrations to last two years. Some registrars offered a one-year registration to users, however, and ate the second year. My understanding is that the name should be deleted when the registrar's contract with the registrant expires, even if addditional years exist between the registrar and the registry. Have we made that clear enough in the draft recommendation?

    Bret


________________________________________________________________________
BIRD & BIRD
The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only.
It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged.
Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. Further, we make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to verify that this email and any attachments are free of viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this e-mail.
Please refer to http://www.twobirds.com/fsma.cfm for our regulatory position under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom.
A full list of partners is available on request.
Details of our offices are available from http://www.twobirds.com

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>