ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-deletes]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Fwd: Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] Fwd: [nc-deletes] Draft report


Danny Younger asked a question I hope someone can answer.

Thanks,

Adam



>Delivered-To: ajp@glocom.ac.jp
>From: DannyYounger@cs.com
>Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:46:08 EST
>Subject: Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] Fwd: [nc-deletes] Draft report
>To: ajp@glocom.ac.jp, discuss@icann-ncc.org
>
>Adam,
>
>In addition to the four issues cited in the draft report, I am aware of
>another issue:
>
>When a credit card chargeback has occured, the registrar will often take the
>domain and transfer it to the registrar's internal "unpaid names department"
>(the rationale is that the registrar has lost the opportunity to receive a
>credit from the registry and has also incurred the added expense of a
>chargeback fee).  In such circumstances the name is not released to the
>general pool of available names and effectively becomes a proprietary holding
>of the registrar.  
>
>Has there been any discussion of this topic within the committee?


-- 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>