RE: [nc-corp] GNSO budget issues beyond 1 July 2003

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@att.com>]

I recall that extensions were made with understandings that constituencies would 
make efforts to make contributions toward their share of operating the Council. 

Within the budget committee, let's discuss a balanced approach which 
achieves some degree of fairness to those who have borne the financial 
responsibilities, with some degree of debt forgiveness for a reasonable amount of 
debt. I believe that it is unrealistic, and probably even unfair, to forgive all the obligations for a viable
constituency.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller@syr.edu]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:23 PM
To: Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au
Cc: roger@cochetti.us; nc-corp@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-corp] GNSO budget issues beyond 1 July 2003


I agree, and therefore we should write them off. 

>>> "Roger J. Cochetti" <roger@cochetti.us> 06/06/03 03:58PM >>>
>Under widespread accounting practices, most or all of 
>these assets would have been written off as uncollectable 
>long ago, so their value as "assets of the GNSO" is pretty 
>doubtful.