[nc-budget] NC meeting Feb 8
Roger et al,
1. Now that I am NC chair I would like to follow the
example of Ken who remained an observer to the budget committee but not an
active participant. As such I will intercede from time to time but exempt
myself from Budget committee votes, proposals etc.
2. As you know the NC rejected (by
abstentions) the budget committee proposal on the 2001 subs and will be
revisiting the item on Feb 8.
"Item1: Budget Committee - revisiting the recommendation on 2001 budget
and
constituency contributions (Roger Cochetti) - 30 mins" The NC seemed to have no problem with the proposed 2001 budget
but indicated concern on the question of constituency
subs.
Could I ask the budget committee to prepare three options for
the NC to discuss.
Option 1: the previous proposal (= 2001 budget less voluntary
shared by 7)
Option 2: a new proposal (=2001 budget less voluntary
less surplus of subs 1999 and 2000 RECEIVED as at 31 Jan 2001 shared
by 7).
Option 3: a new proposal (=2001 budget less voluntary
less surplus of subs 1999 and 2000 REQUESTED shared by 7).
Please indicate the advantages/disadvantages of each
option.
Philip.
Philip Sheppard
AIM - European Brands Association 9 av. des Gaulois B-1040 Brussels Tel +322 736 0305 Fax +322 734 6702
|