RE: [nc-budget] NAMES COUNCIL BUDGET COMMITTEE DRAFT REPORT TO NAMES COUNCIL

["Cochetti, Roger" <rogerc@netsol.com>]

OK Phillip

 

Let's drop the specific bullets on allocating funds for a recording secretary and for Web-hosting services from our immediate report to the Council (although, as a result, that means the Council may simply act on either of these without Budget Committee input).

 

As a result, however, I'll try to get another Budget Committee teleconference together for sometime next week so that we can discuss in a more comprehensive way allocations from the existing funds.

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 11:14 AM
To: nc-budget@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-budget] NAMES COUNCIL BUDGET COMMITTEE DRAFT REPORT TO NAMES COUNCIL

Fellow budget committee - just for clarification - and to convince myself that my memory is not failing!

 

In March the NC resolved:

"20. Roger Cochetti : My motion is: "The NC hereby endorse for the year 2000 the
          expenditure of $US 95500 with the expenses as broken down in the
          proposal as by Ken." namely: 

Web Hosting & Connectivity:$ 5,000

Teleconferences:7,200

Salaries:55,000

Office expenses 10,800

Office set up  3,000                                    

Travel  7,500

Incidentals 15,000

Audio archiving 4,000

Total including contingency $95,500     

 

So, there is an issue for us to sort out. Lets do this on the Budget Committee and not try to do so at the next NC.

 

Philip.