RE: [nc-budget] A call

[Dany Vandromme <vandrome@renater.fr>]

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, erica.roberts wrote:

> Seems to me that the subgroup, lead by Erica was made from Erica, myself,
> >Elisabeth and Peter De Blanc.
> >Did I miss someone?
> 
> Yep - you missed someone. Chuck Gomes is standing in for Roger and has done a 
> lot of work in progressing the issue.  He has also very kindly volunteered to 
> host the teleconf.  I don't believe we can afford to loose him!
-
Of course.
Sorry for the miss but as even Ken was part of the discussion, I was a
bit confusing (may like yourself) between the sub-goup and the nc-budget
Apologize for Chuck who did contribute a lot already
-
> 
> erica
> 
> >===== Original Message From Dany Vandromme <vandrome@renater.fr> =====
> >On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, erica.roberts wrote:
> >
> >> We seem to be loosing a thread here - I had proposed a teleconf of the nc
> >> budget sub-committee to finalise the proposals for the search process,
> >> selection criteria and selection process for consideration by the nc budget
> >> committee.  However, it is unclear who is on the nc buddget subcommittee 
> and
> >> it seems that the call has been put out for a meeting of the entire nc 
> budget
> >> committee.  This is not necessarily a bad thing - but we need to be clear
> >> about what we're doing.
> >-
> >Seems to me that the subgroup, lead by Erica was made from Erica, myself,
> >Elisabeth and Peter De Blanc.
> >Did I miss someone?
> >-
> >>
> >> The sub-committee was tasked with formulating proposals for (i) the search
> >> process, (ii) the selection criteria and (iii) the selection process.  I 
> have
> >> put out a draft proposal on the selection criteria and selection process 
> (see
> >> attached).  Chuck has volunteered to draft a proposal on the search process
> >> but this has not yet been put out for comment.  The sub-committee was not
> >> tasked with refining the job description - this is a matter for the full nc
> >> budget committee.
> >-
> >Agree with Erica
> >-
> >>
> >> If the meeting on Fri is to be of the full nc budget committee, who is to
> >> chair - Roger?  Is the agenda to include the job description?
> >-
> >As I told before, I have already a teleconf for the NCC adcom at the same
> >time. I cannot attend both.
> >I would prefer to see the nc-budget planned wit more formalism than just
> >as derivation of that specific subgroup made of 3 or 4 individuals.
> >-
> >>
> >> erica
> >>
> >> >===== Original Message From "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com> =====
> >> >ok by me
> >> >
> >> >ken
> >> >----- Original Message -----
> >> >From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
> >> >To: <nc-budget@dnso.org>
> >> >Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:44 AM
> >> >Subject: Re: [nc-budget] A call
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> A call this Friday September 29 at 8am EST is fine by me.
> >> >> Philip
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
> >
> >                Reseau National de Telecommunications
> >         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
> >
> >                                  |  ENSAM
> >Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> >Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
> >E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

                Reseau National de Telecommunications 
         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                  |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------