ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[gTLD-com]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gtld-com] Request for final comments


Dear Philip,

Thomas Keller's thinking is just in line with my comment on differentiation 
as it is described at this text. And you are exactly right in trying to 
separate the intrinsic difference. Then, in my view, the best way to 
clarify your intention is to remove add-value paragraph as Thomas requests.


Regards,

Chun Eung Hwi


On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:06:58 +0200, Philip Sheppard 
<philip.sheppard@aim.be> wrote:

> Thomas,
> thanks for the support and comment.
>
> As you know, adding value was one of the criteria in the Lynn report 
> which was supported in the registrars position paper.
> You are right to point out the intrinsic difference between the objective 
> of adding value and the need for ICANN to make  a judgment about this. I 
> believe this is why Bruce earlier made the suggestion which I will act 
> upon in separating out the objectives in expanding the name space from 
> the criteria that may apply to any applicant registry.
>
> Philip
>



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Chun Eung Hwi
General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2-2166-2216
Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667
Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun@peacenet.or.kr
---------------------------------------------------------------


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>