ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions


On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 04:27:37PM -0800, George Kirikos wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> --- Rodrigo  Orenday Serrato <rorenday@banxico.org.mx> wrote:
> > 15 days seems more than fair a period prior deletion.
> > 
> > I don't know how it is elsewhere, but in Mexico one has 9 working
> > days to
> > reply to a law suit, period after which you would find yourself in
> > default
> 
> The big difference, though, is that the clock begins in real court once
> you are *served* the legal process. Process servers often try multiple
> times to reach a defendant. An email sitting on a server somewhere that
> hasn't been read doesn't constitutive being served in any jurisdiction
> I know of. Can you *prove* that a standard email notification was
> actually read??

So you think that the UDRP should duplicate the full legal aparatus of 
serving process?

Kent
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>