<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Reverses Barcelona.com Deci sion
Hi..
Como las cosas tambien pueden cambiar... el texto completo de la noticia
referenciada (barcelona.com), asi como el texto de la resolución en:
La Noticia, publicada por Javier Maestre (Dominiuris.com):
http://latinoamericann.derecho.org.ar/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=293&mode=thread&order=1&thold=0
La sentencia dictada por la Corte de Apelación puede encontrarse en:
http://www.bufetalmeida.com/barcelonacom.pdf
Saludos
Erick Iriarte Ahon
LatinoamerICANN (Un Proyecto Alfa-Redi)
http://www.alfa-redi.org
At 08:23 a.m. 03/06/2003 -0400, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
>Well, only a little complicated, maybe? trademark is territorial and
>always has been. The Spanish court
>
>1. might not have personal jurisdiction over a US firm marketing to US
>clients
>
>2. even if it did, wisely might not exercise it under forum non conveniens
>
>3. even if exercised jurisidiction, would rule about the use of the name
>*in spain*
>
>4. injunctive relief would risk hitting the first amendment (cf. Yahoo
>case....); damages would fall under well established principles of
>enforcement.
>
>5. Note, however, that any claim in Spain would be a traditional
>infringement claim -- NOT a claim for ownership of the domain name. And
>that's exactly as it should be.
>
>On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 richard.hill@itu.int wrote:
>
> > Under US law, says the US court.
> >
> > But what about Spanish law? Not applicable in US court, because of
> ACPA and
> > the general principle of territoriality of trademark law, says the US
> court.
> >
> > However, I suppose, the City Council of Barcelona could bring an action in
> > Spanish courts, under Spanish law, if it felt that the activities exercised
> > under the disputed domain name were violating Spanish law in Spain.
> >
> > If such an action suceeded in Spain, then the question of whether or
> not the
> > Spanish court's decision could be enforced in the US is probably a
> > complicated question.
> >
> > Best,
> > Richard Hill
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. [mailto:john@johnberryhill.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, 02 June 2003 22:43
> > > To: [GA]
> > > Subject: [ga] 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Reverses Barcelona.com
> > > Decision
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > As if anyone needed to know, "Barcelona" is not a trademark
> > > of the City of
> > > Barcelona:
> > >
> > > http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/021396.P.pdf
> > >
> > >
> > > It looks like an update will be needed here to avoid false
> > > advertising:
> > > http://www.oblon.com/barcelona/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
>
>--
> Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
>A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm
>U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
>+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
> -->It's hot here.<--
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|