Re: [ga] Who speaks for the ALAC?

["Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vittorio Bertola" <vb@bertola.eu.org>
> >>
> >Although grammatically correct, technically speaking, "we" should be 
> >replace with "Denise, Esther and I"
> 
> This is not correct. You may visit
> 
> http://forum.icann.org/mail-archive/alac/
> 
2003 May 23 
[alac] Announcement, Paul Twomey
=====

Do you really think the average American is interested in being censored, constrained, silenced, etc.
by some narrow-minded people, operating on a toy 32-bit network, that has no band-width to the U.S. ?

The laws of physics, the speed of light and electrons, etc. will move Americans closer together. The
censored world will therefore be moved much farther away. You can not change the laws of physics.
http://www.telegeography.com/resources/maps_and_schematics/telephony/tg99_tariff_maps.html

The always-on, broadband Internet, and the coming services (including 128-bit DNS) will not be deployed
around the world, before they are wide-spread in America. People on the toy, 32-bit Internet, will
therefore, always be looking in, via a small pipe, and will become a more and more irrelevant group of wannabees.
You can not change the laws of physics.

Americans and the American marketplace will always reject censorship from abroad.
That is one of the reasons why people around the world are still attracted to America
...where the InterNAT (North American Transport) continues to grow...

Jim Fleming
http://www.IPv8.info


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html