Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions
This is very good to read.
It is important that we look into multi-cultural applications and learn from
It is also important that we not interfere with that diversity.
But it is also important that we commit to what we believe is right and not
just "throw it out there".
You are a great example of knowledge and I thank you for contribution.
> Dear Marilyn and all,
> FYI - this is how the CH and LI people do it:
> Regards, Dora Gerber
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <email@example.com>
> To: "DPF" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "Vittorio Bertola" <email@example.com>;
> "Sabine van-almsick (E-mail)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: <email@example.com>; <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>;
> <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:25 PM
> Subject: RE: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions
>> David, you are a great resource to help us find out more about what
> do... in this area. Do you know what Domainz does? Is there a way to
> find out what some of the larger ccTLDs do? Such as .de; .uk; .au; .fr;
> etc.? Perhaps there is learning which the gTLDs can take from the
> ccTLDs. Many ccTLDs have regisrtrations from other countries so have
> the postal delivery issues as well.
>> I'd be happy to post any relevant and factual responses we might be
> to get to the WHOIS TF list.
>> Regards, Marilyn Cade
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: DPF [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:47 PM
>> To: Vittorio Bertola
>> Cc: email@example.com; Cade,Marilyn S - LGA;
>> DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
>> Subject: Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions
>> On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:15:40 +0100, Vittorio Bertola
>> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> >On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:19:59 +1300, you wrote:
>> >>If the registrant is a legitimate user, then once their domain stops
>> >>working they will eventually contact the registrar to get it fixed.
>> >The problem is that it might be too late - you might already be
>> >losing valuable e-mail messages or website traffic. So even before
>> >putting the domain on hold all efforts have to be made to contact the
>> >registrant and fix the problem (and let alone the fact that one has
>> >the right not to expose his/her identity to the whole world).
>> The issue of should you be allowed to be anonymous is a slightly
>> different debate. For now the policy is you need correct data and the
>> issue is how to mitigate potential loss of a domain and purchase by
>> someone else (which is far worse).
>> I agree putting on hold is not without consequences and there should
>> be a minimum of three attempts to contact the registrant.
>> E-mail: email@example.com
>> ICQ: 29964527
>> MSN: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
>> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html