ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Antitrust Violations


Rick, 

You may recall that the White Paper stated:  "Governance. The organizing 
documents (Charter, Bylaws, etc.) should provide that the new corporation is 
governed on the basis of a sound and transparent decision-making process, 
which protects against capture by a self-interested faction."

Contracting parties are by definition a self-interested faction.  The recent 
ERC plan to change the voting structure of the GNSO allows for the 
decision-making process to be captured by this group of "contracting 
parties".  Why should we support this naked power grab that enhances the 
voting power of registries and registrars at the expense of the rest of the 
constituencies?

You want a proposal?  Fine.  Adopt the proposed Resolution #2 cited at 
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc11/msg00044.html which deems any 
variation from the principle of equal stakeholder constituency representation 
and votes in the proposed GNSO council as unacceptable.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>