Re: [ga] ERC's Second Implementation Report

[Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>]

On 2002-09-14 18:28:45 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>Under the ERC's plan, the votes of those under contract are  
>equivalent to the votes of the remaining constituencies.  If the  
>registries and registrars do not support a proposal (perhaps  
>because it will cost them money), the consensus policy  
>recommendation will never be passed because a two-thirds vote is  
>now theoretically unattainable, and even the additional votes of  
>the NonCom selected members are insufficient to reach that  
>two-thirds level.

See <http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc11/msg00034.html>.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.INFO/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html