Re: Jeff Williams FAQ was Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] HMS...

[Gary Osbourne <gro@direct.ca>]

At 10:27 AM 06/08/02 -0400, Joe Baptista wrote:

>thats not a reatraction.  like i said - i have yet to see any retraction
>concerning jeff.  and just editing jeff out of a story is not a
>retraction.

It is a retraction of previously published
information. Which isn't to say a cache or
archive might not have the earlier version.

>a proper retraction is when the news source intentionally writes an
>article which retracts jeff as a credible source and says why it did such
>a thing.

Agreed. That is a proper retraction. Proving
only that one should be skeptical of the online
press as well, particularily as information can
be retracted more easily and less transparently
than recalling and re-editing all copies of a
newspaper, for example. One does come to learn,
or fails at one's peril, which online news and
other sources of information are more credible,
and more trustworthy. You're a prankster Joe, so
one must be wary of you. ICANN is also well down
that spectrum, Jeff Williams is near the bottom. -g

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html