RE: [ga] Re: and if we addressed the problem at its real root? (was Re: Names Council Resolution on Reform)

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga-full@dnso.org] 
|> On Behalf Of todd glassey
|> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 2:37 AM
|> To: Vittorio Bertola; Sandy Harris; J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin
|> Cc: ga@dnso.org; vint cerf
|> Subject: [ga] Re: and if we addressed the problem at its 
|> real root? (was Re: Names Council Resolution on Reform)
|> 
<SNIP> 
|> However - A simple solution based on  NAT and Search 
|> Engines, which did not exist when DNS was formulated or 
|> evolved, is easily fielded. And if they ( the Search Engines 
|> and NAT) had existed at the time that DNS was setup, then 
|> its my opinion that  DNS would look much different. instead 
|> of like the stand-alone embedded address resolution system 
|> it is today.
<SNIP>

Todd

You might like to study NAT and the problems that exist with it's use
before you go touting it off as part of any solution involving DNS.  NAT
breaks a lot of DNS related communications at the application level.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html