Re: [ga] WLS: Dotster posts the definitive arguments against it, and more
You dont understand, George. ICANN is controlled by the likes
of VSGN - ICANN will do *their* bidding, not what is right for
the rest of the internet.
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Kirikos" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: [ga] WLS: Dotster posts the definitive arguments against it, and more
> --- "L. Gallegos" <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I am totally against the WLS, but could you explain how it effects
> > security and stabiltiy of the DNS? We're talking about .COM, not the
> > entire internet.
> I'm glad you brought that up, about .COM possibly not being the entire
> internet. I draw your attention to the statements of Verisign at:
> Verisign stated clearly that "I don't think there will *EVER* be
> another .com" (emphasis added) It's that special place in the DNS that
> requires that ICANN pay particular attention to the monopolist
> Verisign, since by their own admission they are not just another
> George Kirikos
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
> Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html