Re: [ga] Karl's latest
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Eric Weisberg wrote:
> > Andy Mueller-Maguhn wrote:
> > > Exactly this is at least my reason for voting in favour of the
> > > blueprint as at least a less-worse solution then strong governmental
> > > involvement would be.
> Is there a point where governments are better able to represent the interests of citizens than
> private, non-membership organizations?
no. control of the dns resides with the end user. impossing government
control on the dns would require monopoly - and icann is a false monopoly
- so at best any government representation will end up in the gutter.
granted government intervention at this point will prolong it's life - but
in the end it is end users who are in charge when it comes to root.
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html