ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] OECD vs ICANN, re: WHOIS accuracy


Hello,

--- Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>   I agree with you personally, entirely.  I am also amazed and
> somewhat
> disgusted that on the ending of the Independence Day Weekend that
> George or anyone else could possibly espouse of propose anything
> that would infringe on the freedoms that so many have fought and
> died for all over the globe, and especially in the US.  Truly
> appalling!

Trying to imply that my (or the OECD, or others') sense of patriotism
is any less, for seeking responsible behaviour is a bit of a cheap
shot, especially coming from someone who lives in a fantasy world,
according to:

http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/05551.html
http://www.dnso.org/history/www.dnso.org/discuss/mail-archive/02277.html

I can understand why WHOIS accuracy wouldn't be important to folks who
want to build a fictitious existence on the 'net. There are costs and
benefits to privacy, as I've argued before. There's no point in arguing
with some folks who suggest that the value of their privacy is
infinite, yet won't pay $2 to $5 for that privacy.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>