Re: [ga] The Real World "email is the killer"

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Marilyn;

Please read before you misquote! I was addressing email as the means of verifying purchase.  Make damn sure you note that I did not say 95% of ecommerce via email.

Yes my percentages include b-b and most b-b is done by non domain name holders even though they may work for Goliath's like ATT.  These are the people actually using the Internet - not just profiting by it.

That is called a user.  When you design a keyboard do you care what ATT wants or what the millions of data entry people throughout the world want?

This type of spinning is exactly what they want to replace the newly opened seat on the ICON baud. It is quite obvious your application has been submitted and you would do well to jump ship before your stock does
another dive.

Sincerely,
Eric


"Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" wrote:

> I'm a little confused... 95% of ecommerce via email... hmmm, well, we can explore that, but ecoommerce - b- b has always dwarfed B-C, but we all want/believgetht B-C and C-C will, someday be a significant player.
>
> Perhaps Eric is focused on consumer only,which might explain the percentages he quotes.
> What are the b-b stats?
>
> MC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eric@hi-tek.com [mailto:eric@hi-tek.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:50 PM
> To: Marc Schneiders
> Cc: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA; ga@DNSO.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] The Real World "email is the killer"
>
> Most of the world translates IT into Information Technology.  To my knowledge 95% of all
> ecommerce is conducted in one portion or another through email.  I believe that if we include
> chat rooms and message boards and similar mechanism we find about 70% of Internet use now is in
> an email form; interpersonal communications.  Interactive.
>
> So what does the DNSO of the ICANN have to do with that?  Email goes to an address, which like a
> street address is made up of names and numbers, as far as most users know.
>
> Why would such a large portion of the use be ignored by ICANN? Or just as importantly by a
> company whose stock is falling like a dead bird out of a tree.
>
> Eric
>
> Marc Schneiders wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 22 May 2002, at 21:51 [=GMT-0400], Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> >
> > > Industry says, no. Thank you, but no. We will continue to evolve ICANN and
> > > welcome the support of governments [or multilateral organizations/treaty organizations]
> > > to private sector leadership.  We urge governments to work to support ICANN; to participate
> > > in GAC. To lend support to ICANN's activities. NOT to compete, and not to seek to
> > > take on functions which belong to ICANN.
> >
> > ICANN manages a cartel of registries and registrars. The market cannot
> > decide therefore. Voting with $$ is impossible. Well, not absolutely
> > impossible. An alternative root is possible, naturally. But it is very
> > hard, and hardly what the industry would like.
> >
> > The industry should therefore recognize that it cannot ignore its
> > customers, despite the fact that it has a monopoly.
> >
> > On a more principal level: The Internet is different from other networks,
> > like cable television. It is not merely about suppliers and consumers. It
> > is also that, but at the same time it functions like the telephone
> > network, where the users make the content, not companies. Email is the
> > killer application. Despite all spam mainly a user to user tool.
> >
> > So put users into your picture. Give them votes like you have votes. Like
> > it was meant to be, half of the votes on the Board of ICANN.
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html