Re: Membership criteria - was [ga] NC BS

["Roberto Gaetano" <ploki_xyz@hotmail.com>]

Joop Teernstra wrote:
>
>Interesting information. So if the outcome of the election had been
>different, the w-dogs might have yapped?
>

I remember another case, the selection of a DNSO-elected ICANN Director.
A large number of brand new people expressed statements of support to a 
candidate. Of course the matter was investigated, but dropped as soon as 
endorsement from 10 valid individuals was found.
Should this not have been the case, you bet that the matter would have been 
investigated further.

I don't know what you mean exactly by "if the outcome of the election had 
been different". If you mean "if the result of the vote would have been 
altered by inclusion/exclusion of the doubtful ballots", the answer is "yes, 
the ballots would have been investigated further".
On the other hand, if the few questionable ballots do not influence the 
result, there is little motivation to do the extra work: the case is only 
useful to check whether the voting rules can be improved to 
diminuish/eliminate grey areas for the future.

Best regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html