4124304370.20020514211949@wxweb.com">
Tuesday, May 14, 2002, 6:56:53 PM, William S. Lovell wrote:
William X Walsh wrote:
You may not like it, but personally I don't care one
damn bit what you like, Bill.
Well, now. This was addressed to the ga@dnso.org, not to you. I had
Doesn't change the response at all.
What you don't like is irrelevant.
The REALITIES are relevant.
The reality is that the GA has a specific role, as defined by ICANN's
charter. The role is clear, and it is also VERY clear that this
motion is outside of that role and entirely non-topical and out of
scope for the GA.
The fact remains that this issue has been raised and pointed out to
the chair, who has still failed to address an answer to the GA on the
issue, pretending it doesn't exist perhaps.
That does not do him, nor the GA, any justice.
How you addressed your comments are of no concern to my response,
actually I don't read CC'd copies of list emails anyway, so I read
your message off the list and responded to it as a list mail.
The chair has a responsibility to address this issue, and should have
done so long before now.
I and the rest of the GA are still wait
ing, Thomas.