ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Slashdot.


Monday, May 06, 2002, 5:57:42 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:

> We really have to do some thinking here.

> Do you want new people or not.  You cannot greet them with a closed club
> attitude and act like they do not belong here if they have not been here
> and really do any kind of outreach.  You cannot only welcome seasoned
> engineers and expect this bottoms up experiment to work.

The issue, Eric and everyone else, is that they are coming in for the
sole purpose of trying to influence the outcome of a single issue, not
to be a part of the overall process.

If the outreach was to have a voice within the ICANN/DNSO process,
rather than recruiting people for the specific purpose of supporting
Jamie's attempt at trying to embarrass ICANN at the expense of the
legitimacy of the DNSO GA, then I would have no problem with it at
all.

But in this case, it is ONLY resulting in getting voices to back up
his little agenda.

And in so doing, he has proven ICANN right about the GA, and further
justified their completely ignoring us.

Bravo, Jamie, Bravo.  You have played right into their hands.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!  
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>