[ga] Re: anyone notice fallout from this?
- To: <email@example.com>
- Subject: [ga] Re: anyone notice fallout from this?
- From: "John Palmer" <jp@ADNS.NET>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:59:20 -0500
- References: <200204231938.PAA28240@elektra.ultra.net>
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Griffin" <email@example.com>
To: "John Palmer" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: anyone notice fallout from this?
> In the referenced message, John Palmer said:
> [Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John R. LoVerso" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > To: <email@example.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:26 PM
> > Subject: anyone notice fallout from this?
> > > ------- Start of forwarded message -------
> > > This document describes the 'Root Fix for the .US Top Level Domain'.
> > > Fix is a series of actions taken by the Open Root Server Confederation
> > > (ORSC) to prevent the destabilization of the DNS due to ICANN's
> > > introduction of colliding top level domains. This document describes
> > > actions taken bythe ORSC to remedy the collateral damage that has been
> > > directly caused to the .US top level domain in non-ICANN root systems.
> > >
> > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> > >
> > t
> > > ------- End of forwarded message -------
> > Lets get something straight.
> > 1. ORSC and Inclusive Namespace roots did not cause this problem,
> > did
> > by deliberatly moving the .US nameservers under BIZ.
> > 2. ICANN's versionof .BIZ is the collider.
> > No damage has been done that hasn't already been fixed.
> > John
> ITYM "alternative roots" were the cause of the problem.
> DNS has but one root. You may not like that root, you may seek to
> change that root, but it only has 1 root.
> To join this list, send "subscribe usdom" to
The internet has one namespace, not one root. If someone goes and
causes instability by creating collisions, that is wrong. If someone (or
is hell-bent at destroying any and all competition and is willing to
the internet by moving an entire ccTLD to gtld servers that are on an
colliding version of a TLD, that too is wrong.
1: The Neulevel BIZ is illegitimate because it was not the first to
be in continuous operation. In the opinion of a growing number of
people, ICANN and Neulevel perpetrated a theft.
2: The reason that they moved .US gtld servers under .BIZ was
to try to harm the competiton by trying to force the ever-growing
list of ISPs using inclusive namespace root servers to switch
back. They failed.
3: Typical of ICANN apologists, the poster tries to take an act
of sabatoge and theft (perpetrated by you know who) that was intended
to try and stamp out legitimate businesses, and turns around
and tries to blame the intended victims.
Sorry - wrong answer, but thank you for playing
AGN Domain Name Services : http://www.adns.net
Censorship-Free GA list : http://dns-o.org/mailman/listinfo/ga
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html