Re: [ga] Re: Survey

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

Danny - feel free to stand by them, but you incorrect in this case. Not
having bothered to check the link that you presented as proof of some
conspiracy, I can't talk on an informed basis concerning which draft of the
survey that you are talking about - however, this document has undergone
many revisions - all based on input and criticism put forth by the drafting
team.

At this point, I can't remember who was even responsible for putting forward
the first draft (I can look it up when I get back to the office if its
important) - but I do distinctly remember a number of conversations, dozens
of emails and a conference call or two between thedrafting team members
through the preparation of this draft.

The important task now is for the TF to read through this draft, tear it
apart (or not) and get it into the hands of users that aren't
directly/officially represented in ICANN.

-rwr

----- Original Message -----
From: <DannyYounger@cs.com>
To: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:18 PM
Subject: [ga] Re: Survey


> Dan Steinberg has asked that I retract the accusation that:
>
> "Why don't you come clean, and admit that this is solely Ross's
> work-product that you modified only in the most minor of ways"
>
> I stand by my comments, and have produced a side-by-side comparison
between
> the survey questions created by Ross and the survey questions produced by
the
> "small group of TF members" posted at http://www.icannworld.org/survey.htm
>
> Let the GA decide if anything more than minor modifications are present.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html