Re: [ga] Successor agency. (was: Substance over rhetoric )

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 14:20 21/03/02 +0100, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>On 03:14 21/03/02, Joop Teernstra said:
>>
>>Do you have any illusion that brute financial and lobbying power is not 
>>going to define the structures of a successor agency?
>
>No. This is why we have to structure a consensus where that is 
>structurally *prevented*.

I see a contradiction between the words consensus (fuzzy) and structure 
(rigid).

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html