Re: [ga] Re: Unresponsive registrars
Yeah. That's how I feel when I get an inquiry from the IRS, too. :-)
Equally, however, non-responsiveness is not an attractive option.
Tuesday, February 26, 2002, 2:41:40 PM, William X Walsh <email@example.com> wrote:
WXW> Tuesday, Tuesday, February 26, 2002, 12:14:54 PM, William X Walsh wrote:
>> Tuesday, Tuesday, February 26, 2002, 10:04:52 AM, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>>> Dear Rick,
>>> At issue is why many US registrars failed to provide a response to a House
>>> Judiciary Subcommittee inquiry. This is more troubling than the current
>>> technological limitations on authentication.
>> Probably because they recognized the inquiry itself was just plain
>> stupid. The question is an obvious one.
WXW> Also, the registrars are private entities, who are bound by no
WXW> agreement with the government. They really have no obligation to
WXW> respond to such queries.
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html