Re: [ga] Re: Unresponsive registrars
Tuesday, Tuesday, February 26, 2002, 12:14:54 PM, William X Walsh wrote:
> Tuesday, Tuesday, February 26, 2002, 10:04:52 AM, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>> Dear Rick,
>> At issue is why many US registrars failed to provide a response to a House
>> Judiciary Subcommittee inquiry. This is more troubling than the current
>> technological limitations on authentication.
> Probably because they recognized the inquiry itself was just plain
> stupid. The question is an obvious one.
Also, the registrars are private entities, who are bound by no
agreement with the government. They really have no obligation to
respond to such queries.
William X Walsh <email@example.com>
"There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of
the law. No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer
interprets the truth."
-- Jean Giradoux
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html