DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: [DNS] thread.119

  • To: "Kim Davies" <kim@cynosure.com.au>
  • Subject: [ga] Re: [DNS] thread.119
  • From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:59:30 +1100
  • Cc: "[ga]" <ga@dnso.org>
  • References: <9739074218BCD411A7D400508BD6371702D12D47@MELEXCH1> <200201162310.g0GNA9B22425@boombox.cyber.com.au> <20020117000746.GA2416@ebola>
  • Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org

On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:07:46 +0800, Kim Davies wrote:

> The fact is, many people think they are valuable. If anyone here wants
> to convince them that they are not then I think you are probably wasting
> your time. Let them find out for themselves.

Hi Kim

Sometimes this thread gets complicated so excuse me if I am repeating someone
else or, indeed, if you or others don't get what I am saying.


IF "many people *think* they are valuable" (and are prepared to pay good
money) THEN they *are* valuable.  That's just supply and demand.

Whether or not they work as a search mechanism is not relevant.

Best regards
Patrick Corliss

This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>