RE: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

|> From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com]
|> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 12:45 PM
|> 
|> WXW and all assembly members,
|> 
|> William X Walsh wrote:
|> 
|> > Sunday, Sunday, October 28, 2001, 12:33:22 AM, Joop 
|> Teernstra wrote:
|> >
|> > > At 17:38 26/10/01 -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
|> >
|> > >>I think it's a potentially interesting idea, but I find 
|> it unlikely that
|> > >>you'll ever get "consensus"(aka the ICANN staff and BOD) 
|> to buy into it.
|> > >>There's also a pretty significant enforcement issue. How 
|> would you propose
|> > >>to enforce judgements?
|> >
|> > > Forfeiture of a Bond in favour of the successful defendant?
|> > > We can at least *try*.
|> >
|> > Ok, so the first step would be for someone to draw up a document
|> > detailing changes that would need to be made to the current UDRP to
|> > make this happen.  Let's not lose this idea to non-action, 
|> especially
|> > since we have a lot of agreement on it.
|> >
|> > Any volunteers to do that step?
|> 
|>   Sure I will volunteer.  I am sure that with the help of my 
|> legal staff
|> I can come up with something to at least discuss and debate here.
|> What I would like to know however is their a minimum amount that
|> the bond should be set for?

$50K US should cover most expenses.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html