DNSO Archives: [ga]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Explicit Rulings or Vague Mandates ?

To: "watchdog" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Explicit Rulings or Vague Mandates ?
From: William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:43:15 -0700
CC: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>, ga@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <002101c12b61$b61472a0$f143d1d1@kidsearch>
References: <F116f0scL9NtDEJmGzr00004bd5@hotmail.com><3B748B48.DFC0E433@ix.netcom.com> <001901c121fd$53fcbf40$8043d1d1@kidsearch><060101c12b3e$22b2e280$b33efea9@hamza><002101c12b61$b61472a0$f143d1d1@kidsearch>
Reply-To: William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org

Wednesday, Wednesday, August 22, 2001, 4:25:17 PM, watchdog wrote:

> Yes, but a very valid point most seem to miss is that The Names Council
> serves the GA not the other way around. Whenever a nonprofit is to include

No, that is not true.  The Names Council has no obligation to the GA
in that regard.

Whether it should or not is a different story, but let's keep our
facts straight.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

References:
- Re: [ga] Review Task Force List is now publicly archived
  - From: "Roberto Gaetano" <ga_list@hotmail.com>
- [ga] Explicit Rulings or Vague Mandates ?
  - From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>