ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Resolution for Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Supporting Organization




Peter de Blanc wrote:

> Not bad, Chuck! ;-)
>
> Hey, on a more realistic level, so are the ccTLDs.
>
> On a more serious note,  I'd suggest that the Non-Commercials try doing
> what the ccTLD does- find some common ground with other constituencies,
> on some issues, and work together on them.
>
> Isolationism doesn't work in a political arena. Co-operation and
> "give-and-take" work.

Just a note in passing:  Cooperation and give-and-take with other
constituencies
require there to be other constituencies with common goals.  On the face of
it,
it appears to me that the NCDNHC would have quite a bit in common with a
Registrants Constituency, were there such a thing.  If the NCDNHC (which,
in spite of the "Subject" of this email, is still a Constituency and not an
SO,
last time I heard) were so inclined, it might find some allies (numbers?) by

expressing its support for the formation of a Registrants Constituency.

Bill Lovell

>
>
> Peter de Blanc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Gomes,
> Chuck
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 6:55 PM
> To: 'DannyYounger@cs.com'; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [ga] Resolution for Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders
> Supporting Organization
>
> I don't suppose anyone would have any sympathy if I complained that
> VeriSign "is always outnumbered" in the NC?  :)
>
> My apologies; I couldn't resist.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:26 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: [ga] Resolution for Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders
> Supporting Organization
>
> Dear members,
>
> The following resolution has been advanced within the Non-Commercial
> Constituency.  While it is too early to tell whether the proposition
> will
> meet with any degree of success, it does highlight the frustration that
> many
>
> of us are feeling...
>
> August. 17, 2001
>
> YJ Park
>
>                                     Resolution for Non-Commercial Domain
> Name Holders Supporting Organization
>
> The current Non-Commercial Domain Names Holders Constituency of Domain
> Names
>
> Supporting Organization has been recognized by the ICANN Board in
> Santiago in
> August ICANN meeting, 2000.
>
> Since then, non-commercial domain names holders constituency has been
> encountering an endless challenge in the DNSO. It is always outnumbered
> in
> DNSO decision-making process by the majority votes.
>
> (snip)
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--


The URLs for Best Practices: DNSO Citation:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/gaindex.html
(Under "Other Information Documents"; "August 2001:
Proposal for Best Practices for the DNSO GA")
Part I:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BestPractices.html
Part II:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010813.GA-BP-flowchart.pdf
(Access to the .pdf file requires installing the Adobe Acrobat
Reader, which is available for free down load at
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html.)


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>