Re: [ga] MOTION - Moving Discussion Off the GA List

["L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>]

I tend to agree with this motion.  There is a group working very hard 
on procedures and rules and that's where the discussion should 
take place.  

Leah


On 13 Jul 2001, at 16:18, Patrick Corliss wrote:

> The folowing motion has been proposed, seconded and amended.
> 
> (1)    The GA list should be reserved for substantive issues relating
> to DNS policy.  All debate relating to rules, lists, protocols,
> procedures, etc. should be debated on GA-RULES.  However, subscribers
> to GA-RULES may refer issues to the full GA for a determinative ballot
> or follow such other prescribed procedures that have been adopted by
> the General Assembly.
> 
> (2)    The list rules should be amended to include the exact wording
> of (1) above.
> 
> As this motion has generated significant support, I would now ask that
> it be submitted to the DNSO Secretariat for a formal vote.
> 
> Best regards
> Alternate Chair
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html