Re: [ga] Blending Top-down and Bottoms-up
What you have a problem with is bottoms-up open and transparent truth. You and
your ICANN STAFF cronies can go stuff it. The only subversion going on here is
your desire( that of corporate america) to stifle true representativeness of us
dotcommoners. Your tact is offensive. Your demeanor is a misdemeanor. You
belong elsewhere. Please immediately post again with more rhetoric so I can
immediately show it for what it is!
with love, Eric, but stay lonesome!
Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 04:29:19PM -0400, Danny Younger wrote:
> > It is my opinion that what is needed is a structure by which list/committee
> > efforts can be properly organized. We have a need for Terms-of-Reference,
> > for Timelines for preliminary reports and feedback, for Final Reports and a
> > vote by the entirety of the General Assembly on the work-product that has
> > been put forth; we have a need for the equivalent of a Task Force or an
> > ExCom to direct list activities.
> That is, you want to subvert the Names Council. The things you
> describe above are *precisely* what the NC is supposed to do.
> Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
> firstname.lastname@example.org lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html