Re: [ga] 3,328 comments added to this list
on 6/8/01 4:49 PM, Patrick Corliss at firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Could you please, therefore clarify the position for me in clear and
> unequivocal terms? Can you advise what were the terms of reference for the
> WG-REVIEW? To what extent did it complete its task when it was closed down
> by the Names Council? Was any further work performed outside this forum
> and, if so, with what result? Is there a "due" date for completion?
What did your last slave die of? Sorry, it is not my job to bring you up to
speed on issues about which you, of all people, as an officer of the GA,
should be fully informed.
As a courtesy, I have posted the wg-review archive link to the appropriate
list for those willing to do research before passing judgement and workload
Why you moved this thread back to the main list is beyond my understanding,
but for me, it stops here and now.
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html