Re: [ga] Opinion Concerning ICANN Board/ccSO Matter

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Joop and all assembly members,

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> >
> >The ASO and PSO do not have constituencies so why should the ccSO?
>
> A ccSO with a balanced "council of representatives"--balancing supply side
> of the registry business with the Domain Name Holders/registrants would
> give the DNSO a good competition in credibility.

  Not quite, Joop.  To have the proper ballance with a ccSO, would
require also a RegistrantSO and a @largeSO as well with equal number
of seats on teh ICANN BoD...

>
>
> >Nevertheless this is an interesting point.  Should the ccTLD
> >registries be the *only* component of a ccTLD SO?
> >
> >This is worth considering before we get too far down the track.
>
> It is.
>
> --Joop--
> Founder of the Cyberspace Association.
> Former bootstrap of the IDNO (www.idno.org)
> Developer of    The Polling Booth
> www.democracy.org.nz
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html