[ga] Re: DOTCOMMONERS
I think that Patrick has a good point! If the GA is to function as it has
been, my voice should be censored for all time. Our opinions are not worthy of
this great body, and we should be restrained from speaking them. Patrick's help
in doing this off line is very cordial, but I believe in openness and
transparency so I rudely make this post public.
I did not realize I was back on the Corliss controlled list and I gladly
give it up. I apologize to all those who do not wish to recieve my posts. Best
of luck to all. Special thanks to our wonderful Secretariat and the NC, thank
you for making this GA function so well.
I do not want anyone to view Patrick's post as a threat to me or anyone else
who may speak against the TDLA.
Patrick Corliss wrote:
> Hi Danny
> It looks like this message came through GA-ROOTS and that Eric's suspension
> is being lifted today. His comments are, of course, grounds for another
> suspension -- this time for four weeks. However, I'm in favour of allowing
> him the benefit of the doubt on his first posting.
> Nevertheless Eric has shown a persistent tendency to attack you, me, the
> TLDA and anybody else he can think of. Very few of his comments are
> constructive nor do they advance the process. I have no idea what has
> generated such negativity.
> It is a pity because Eric is both intelligent and capable. He certainly has
> the capacity to move the debate forward on behalf of the "dotcommoners" as
> he calls them, for example with the motion for a new Individuals
> My feeling is that you should welcome Eric back to full posting rights with
> a caution that he should moderate his approach.
> I am sending him a copy clearly marked "private correspondence".
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eric Dierker <email@example.com>
> To: Jeff Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: <email@example.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:21 PM
> Subject: Re: FW: [ga-roots] TLD's
> I am very interested in this discussion. Would someone be so kind as to
> me and the rest of us dotcommoners as to what the mission statement is of
> the TLDA
> === don't worry I can read and find like all of us, I am looking for the why
> behind the reason the farmer planted such a seed. I have come to the
> that when Danny Younger so viciously attacked Corliss during the election,
> the TLDA, that he did it out of correct conclusions drawn on ignorance. Now
> has appeared to be educated for he is obviously a great supporter of Corliss
> the TLDA. Would someone so educate me and the rest of us dotcommoners?
> This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
> Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html