Re: [ga] Re: Ballot

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

bruce

maybe i am wrong here, but i believe that the board requires a set of
by-laws from the proposing constituancy...

that is what i am referring to and what i was asking to see..

ken stubbs

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce James" <bmj@keyname.net>
To: "Danny Younger" <webmaster@babybows.com>; "Ken Stubbs"
<kstubbs@digitel.net>
Cc: "GA" <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot


> Ken:
>
>     I think your answer is here:
>
> http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-10mar00.htm#VI-B-3c
>
>
> ARTICLE VI-B: THE DOMAIN NAME SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION
>
> Section 3. THE CONSTITUENCIES
>
> (d) Any group of individuals or entities may petition the Board for
> recognition as a new or separate Constituency. Any such petition will be
> posted for public comment pursuant to Article III, Section 3. The Board
may
> create new Constituencies in response to such a petition, or on its own
> motion, if it determines that such action would serve the purposes of the
> Corporation. In the event the Board is considering acting on its own
motion
> it shall post a detailed explanation of why such action is necessary or
> desirable, set a reasonable time for public comment, and not make a final
> decision on whether to create such new Constituency until after reviewing
> all comments received. Whenever the Board posts a petition or
recommendation
> for a new Constituency for public comment, it will notify the names
council
> and will consider any response to that notification prior to taking
action.
>
>
> /Bruce
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>
> To: "Bruce James" <bmj@bmjames.com>
> Sent: May 19, 2001 12:04
> Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
>
>
> question ?
>
> are you proposing an individual constituancy with the same bylaws proposed
> in 1999 by joop or are you proposing a new individual constituancy with
> different by-laws.. ?
>
> i believe the last proposal & related by-laws were rejected by the board
in
> 1999
>
> ken stubbs
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce James" <bmj@bmjames.com>
> To: "GA" <ga@dnso.org>; "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 11:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
>
>
> > Sure Ken, please look at this Icann site:
> >
> > http://www.icann.org/dnso/additionalpage.htm
> >
> > Regards,
> > /Bruce
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>
> > To: "Bruce James" <bmj@keyname.net>
> > Sent: May 19, 2001 08:49
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
> >
> >
> > pleas provide me with a link to the proposed by-laws for the proposed
> > constituancy
> >
> > thank you
> >
> > ken stubbs
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bruce James" <bmj@keyname.net>
> > To: "babybows.com" <webmaster@babybows.com>; <ga@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 8:56 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
> >
> >
> > > I would suggest that we leave out:  ****or the "approval in principle"
> > ****
> > >
> > > Now it reads:
> > >
> > > The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its support for
the
> > > immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals' Constituency by the ICANN
> > Board
> > > in accordance with its Bylaws.  The General Assembly of the DNSO
> > recommends
> > > to the ICANN Board that it place the creation of such an Individuals'
> > > Constituency (DNSO-IC) on its agenda for a decision at the Stockholm
> > plenary
> > > session.
> > >
> > > /Bruce
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The motion put forward by Joop Teernstra has been worded as a ballot:
> > >
> > >
> > > The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its support for
the
> > > immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals' Constituency by the ICANN
> > Board
> > > in accordance with its Bylaws.  The General Assembly of the DNSO
> > recommends
> > > to the ICANN Board that it place either the creation of such an
> > Individuals'
> > > Constituency or the "approval in principle" on its agenda for a
decision
> > at
> > > the Stockholm plenary session.
> > >
> > > Agree/Disagree
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html