Re: [ga] Re: Ballot
> The motion put forward by Joop Teernstra has been worded as a ballot:
> The General Assembly of the DNSO resolves to express its support for the
> immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals' Constituency by the ICANN Board
> in accordance with its Bylaws.
I'm not crazy about the "immediate acknowledgement" part, seems too aggressive.
Simply "acknowledgement" should suffice.
> The General Assembly of the DNSO recommends
> to the ICANN Board that it place either the creation of such an Individuals'
> Constituency or the "approval in principle" on its agenda for a decision at
> the Stockholm plenary session.
This could be the entire motion in itself, given a slight rewording:
The General Assembly of the DNSO recommends
to the ICANN Board that it place either the creation of an Individuals'
Constituency or the "approval in principle" of such a constituency, on its
agenda for a decision at
the Stockholm plenary session.
My 2 cents on the matter.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html