Re: [ga] DNSO/GA Blocking and other concerns
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:15:53AM +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> We now have elected Chairs. A change of rule that the Chair must list all
> duly seconded motions and give the list the opportunity (72 hours?) to
> lodge opposions, call for amendments or for a vote would be completely
Motion 1: I move that the GA form a WG to examine the finances of each
of the directors, and to recommend the removal of all directors with any
conflicts of interest.
Motion 2: I move that the GA form a WG to examine the desirablitiy of
turning ICANN into a for-profit corporation.
Motion 3: I move that the GA petition the NC for the immediate adoption
of the GA as a constituency.
Motion 4: I move that control of all DNSO mailing lists be immediately
turned over to a committee of volunteers, chaired by Kent Crispin.
Motion 5: I move that the GA forward a resolution to the NC calling for
the immediate suspension of the UDRP.
Five motions should be enough for today. My good friend Jeff Williams
will be seconding these momentarily. I will be coming up with a few
dozen more, tomorrow. I know that some of these are going to be
unpopular, but I agree with you totally that it is vitally important
that every one of them be taken to a full vote of the GA...
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
email@example.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html