Re[2]: [ga] Demanding Inclusion

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Christopher,

Sunday, April 15, 2001, 6:58:32 PM, Christopher Ambler wrote:

>> Some people may have suggested that alternative TLDS should be recognised by
>> ICANN.  It is true that this is seen as one possible solution to the problem.
>> However you are overstating your case by saying that alternative TLDs have
>> "demanded inclusion".
>> 
>> Unless that demand has been made through the proper processes and by paying the
>> US $50,000 to do so ??

> Apparently, not even then.

Since when as an "application" and "application fee" been defined as a
guarantee of approval?

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html