Re: [ga] Removal of Directors
I cannot come up with a good reason why a man as bright as Mr. Crocker would
write and send such a misleading post. Proxy alway has and always will mean to
act "for antoher" and in no way means to act for oneself. Someone once told me
that more U.S. stock is voted by proxy than direct, that could be false, but I
hold proxies and would never consider voting in my interest as opposed to the
Actually maybe we should set up a proxy base for GA and At Large elections.
People could give their proxy to someone who could keep them up to date without
the owner having to follow this list so closely. Maybe this could significantly
help with outreach.
p.s. It is very tiring for us newbies to constantly have to educate the
oldtimers on common words and useage.:>)
Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 01:00 AM 4/10/2001, Siegfried Langenbach wrote:
> >from a legal point of view you are right
> > from a "spirit" point of view 9 against 5 in favor is something I
> >personally would not oversee.
> Siegfried, this sounds as if you believe the rules should be ignored. We
> are talking about formal representation of the DNSO. And the rules were
> created for a reason.
> > from a practical point of view it shows that we should not elect NC-
> >members which are not able to handle proxies :-)
> Proxies means that people who were not selected by their constituencies get
> to represet their constituencies.
> Dave Crocker <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html