Re: [ga] Critics say VeriSign still has advantage
> How about this: If you register a domain and don't have a legitimate
> site running under it within, say, two years, you lose it. What's a
> legitimate site? Of course, that's the tough question. Probably the
> best way to answer it is to allow people to challenge a hoarder's
> registration of a particular domain after two years, as they can
> currently challenge on the basis of trademark infringement.
What do you suggest for domains that are used strictly for email,
server hostnames and the myriad of uses other than the www? The
mistaken supposition that a domain is strictly for the web is part of
the problem, IMO.
Electrical utilities' prices are regulated for the same reason. Thus
should the price of domains be regulated.
Utilities are being de-regulated in the US. However, there is no
comparison between the domain name industry and utilities, IMO.
Also, one does not need an SLD in order to exist on the web or to
have access to it. One does need electricity in order to live in
modern society (at least in developed countries). Domain names
are a retail service - a commodity. There is no shortage of them,
especially with 500 + TLDs. If you regulate domain names, you
should regulate all service industries, retail industries, reseller
programs, distribution industries... Where would you stop?
While I am not a fan of speculation, necessarily, I would certainly
not wish to prevent that industry from operating any more than I
would wish to prevent competition in the ISP industry.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html