DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] gTLD Constituency

> From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 5:22 PM
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:47:44PM -0400, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
> > incumbent); and [3] anyway, it could be worse -- after all, 
> if the gTLD 
> > constituency had more votes, the resulting structure would 
> be even *more* 
> > anticompetitive.
> Jeez.  What an absolutely silly and ridiculous distortion.  The gTLD
> constituency is __14%__ of the NC, for petes sake.  By any 
> measure that
> is a small minority, and it is just silly to claim that the 
> behavior of
> such a small minority is going to make the "resulting structure"
> anticompetitive. 

What I find so silly and ridiculous is the degree of your response for what,
you claim, is such a trivial matter. Were it so trivial, why do you resist?

For the record, I happen to disagree with you.
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>