Re: [ga] ICANN benefits
At 15:42 7/04/01 -0400, Sandy Harris wrote:
>> > > As has been noted frequently, the UDRP needs enhancement. But let's
>> > > attribute more precedent to it or ICANN than is valid.
>> > Specifically, it needs better protection for the domain holders who are
>> > attacked using it.
The enhancement, in the form of protection for the Domain Name Owner, lies
in the formulation (by ICANN's DNSO?) of a DN Owners' "Bill of Rights",
that should be part of the preamble of UDRP rules and all registrar
contracts that refer to them.
(I remember raising this point almost 3 years ago)
Founder of the Cyberspace Association.
Former bootstrap of the IDNO (www.idno.org)
Developer of The Polling Booth
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html