Re: [ga] ICANN benefits
At 11:18 AM 4/7/2001, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 02:04:44PM -0400, Sandy Harris wrote:
> > Also, multiple non-conflicting uses -- as in Sun Oil and Sun Microsystems,
> > both valid trademarks in at least the US -- should be explicitly allowed.
> > The burden of proof for alleged conflict is on the complainant.
ICANN-related discussion lists often must process comments and queries that
are not really a matter of debate as they are a matter of basic
education. That is, the poster is concerned about understanding the actual
terms and conditions of ICANN-related activities.
There will always be new people involved, needing to obtain detailed
background about ICANN-related facts.
The question is how to provide them with the necessary material, short of
saying 'go read the following mass of documents'?
Constantly having to go over basic material on these lists is extremely
Dave Crocker <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html